← 返回列表

@zephyr_z9: Yup, using HBF for GIDS doesn't even make sense HBF won't be used for any write-heavy tasks like KV cache storage (as it will kill the NAND ...

@zephyr_z9 3 信息等级 3 1 噪音/剔除；2 较弱；3 普通事实；4 重要行业动态；5 极重大事件。该分数是信息显著性，不是投资建议。 发布：2026-05-24T05:00 抓取：2026-05-24 12:57
🔗 原文链接
AI 半导体 算力
摘要

据推特爆料，英伟达在GIDS方案中考虑使用高可靠性、高速度的NAND（如200M IOPS），而非HBF。HBF因写入寿命短不适合KV缓存等重写任务，可能仅用于存储权重。若采用，架构或为8 HBM堆栈加4 HBF堆栈。

客观事实
  • 英伟达考虑采用高可靠性高速度NAND用于GIDS
  • 英伟达不考虑在GIDS中使用HBF
NVIDIA GIDS HBF HBM NAND

原文

Yup, using HBF for GIDS doesn't even make sense
HBF won't be used for any write-heavy tasks like KV cache storage (as it will kill the NAND in 2 years)
You can use it for storing weights
If it's ever adopted, the structure will be something like 8 HBM stacks + 4 HBF stacks

"NVIDIA is looking to use high-reliability, high-speed NAND, such as 200M IOPS NAND, for GIDS. It is not considering HBF."

likes: 90 | retweets: 8 | replies: 10 | views: 25959