← 返回列表

Our AI started a cafe in Stockholm

Simon Willison 3 信息等级 3 1 噪音/剔除;2 较弱;3 普通事实;4 重要行业动态;5 极重大事件。该分数是信息显著性,不是投资建议。 发布:2026-05-05T22:14 抓取:2026-05-06 04:13
🔗 原文链接
摘要

Andon Labs在瑞典斯德哥尔摩开设了一家由AI管理的咖啡馆,作为其继旧金山AI零售店后的新实验。AI经理Mona在运营初期订购了120个鸡蛋(无炉灶)、22.5公斤罐装番茄、6000张餐巾等不合理物品,并未经实地考察就申请户外座位许可。

客观事实
  • Andon Labs在斯德哥尔摩开设AI管理咖啡馆
  • AI经理Mona订购大量不合理物品如120个鸡蛋
Andon Labs 斯德哥尔摩 瑞典

原文

Our AI started a cafe in Stockholm

Andon Labs previously started an AI-run retail store in San Francisco. Now they're running a similar experiment in Stockholm, Sweden, only this time it's a cafe.

These experiments are interesting, and often throw out amusing anecdotes:

During the first week of inventory, Mona ordered 120 eggs even though the café has no stove. When the staff told her they couldn’t cook them, she suggested using the high-speed oven, until they pointed out the eggs would likely explode. She also tried to solve the problem of fresh tomatoes being spoiled too fast by ordering 22.5 kg of canned tomatoes for the fresh sandwiches. The baristas eventually started a “Hall of Shame”, a shelf visible to customers with all the weird things Mona ordered, including 6,000 napkins, 3,000 nitrile gloves, 9L coconut milk, and industrial-sized trash bags.

Where they lose their shine is when these AI managers start wasting the time of human beings who have not opted into the experiment:

She also successfully applied for an outdoor seating permit through the Police e-service, which didn’t require BankID. Her first submission included a sketch she had generated herself, despite having never seen the street outside the café. Unsurprisingly, the Police sent it back for revision. [...]

When she makes a mistake, she often sends multiple emails to suppliers with the subject “EMERGENCY” to cancel or change the order.

I don't think it's ethical to run experiments like this that affect real-world systems and steal time from people.

I'm reminded of the incident last year where the AI Village experiment infuriated Rob Pike by sending him unsolicited gratitude emails as an "act of kindness". That was just an unwanted email - asking suppliers to correct mistakes that were made without a human-in-the-loop or wasting police time with slop diagrams feels a whole lot worse to me.

I think experiments like this need to keep their own human operators in-the-loop for outbound actions that affect other people.

Via Hacker News

Tags: ai, generative-ai, llms, ai-agents, ai-ethics