← 返回列表

@gregisenberg: THIS HARVARD STUDY JUST PUT AN LLM AHEAD OF ER DOCTORS Beth Israel gave o1 and real doctors the same 76 ER triage cases. o1: 67%. Doctors: ...

@gregisenberg 3 信息等级 3 1 噪音/剔除；2 较弱；3 普通事实；4 重要行业动态；5 极重大事件。该分数是信息显著性，不是投资建议。 发布：2026-05-04T14:00 抓取：2026-05-04 16:03
🔗 原文链接
AI 行业 研究
摘要

哈佛研究显示，Beth Israel医院用o1和真实医生进行76例急诊分诊测试，o1准确率67%，医生为50-55%。研究指出当前缺乏AI医疗问责框架。

客观事实
  • o1在76个急诊分诊案例中准确率67%
  • 医生准确率为50-55%
Beth Israel o1

原文

THIS HARVARD STUDY JUST PUT AN LLM AHEAD OF ER DOCTORS

Beth Israel gave o1 and real doctors the same 76 ER triage cases. o1: 67%. Doctors: 50-55%.

We're in this weird moment where the AI outperforms the doctor but the doctor is still legally required to ignore it. The study itself says there's no accountability framework. Which means a hospital could have a tool that saves more lives and their lawyers would tell them not to use it.

An AI that's right 67% of the time gets called dangerous.

A doctor that's right 55% of the time gets called board certified.

Whoever figures out how to use AI in healthcare and deal with the liability problem is sitting on a generational company.

likes: 56 | retweets: 3 | replies: 22 | views: 8085